Comparison Overview

London Transport Museum

VS

Manchester Historic Association

London Transport Museum

39 Wellington Street , London, Westminster, GB, WC2E 7BB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltmuseum.co.uk

London Transport Museum explores the story of London and its transport system over the last 200 years, highlighting the powerful link between transport and the growth of modern London, culture and society since 1800. We care for over 450,000 items - preserving, researching and acquiring objects to use in our galleries, exhibitions and other activities. As well as exploring the past, the Museum looks at present-day transport developments and concepts for urban transportation in the future, which includes a contemporary collecting policy for the benefit of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Manchester Historic Association

200 Bedford Street, 103, Manchester, New Hampshire, US, 03101
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://manchesterhistoric.org

Founded in 1896, the Manchester Historic Association is an independent, 501 (c)(3) nonprofit charitable organization with the mission to collect, preserve and share the history of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA. The Association operates the Millyard Museum and the Research Center, both of which are open to the general public. The Association presents a variety of public programs including lectures, walking tours and concerts, and also school programs for students from third grade through college.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manchester-historic-association.jpeg
Manchester Historic Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
London Transport Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manchester Historic Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London Transport Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manchester Historic Association in 2026.

Incident History — London Transport Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London Transport Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manchester Historic Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manchester Historic Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manchester-historic-association.jpeg
Manchester Historic Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

London Transport Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Manchester Historic Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Manchester Historic Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to London Transport Museum company.

In the current year, Manchester Historic Association company and London Transport Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Manchester Historic Association company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Manchester Historic Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Manchester Historic Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

London Transport Museum company employs more people globally than Manchester Historic Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Manchester Historic Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References