Comparison Overview

London Transport Museum

VS

Historic Philadelphia, Inc.

London Transport Museum

39 Wellington Street , London, Westminster, GB, WC2E 7BB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ltmuseum.co.uk

London Transport Museum explores the story of London and its transport system over the last 200 years, highlighting the powerful link between transport and the growth of modern London, culture and society since 1800. We care for over 450,000 items - preserving, researching and acquiring objects to use in our galleries, exhibitions and other activities. As well as exploring the past, the Museum looks at present-day transport developments and concepts for urban transportation in the future, which includes a contemporary collecting policy for the benefit of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historic Philadelphia, Inc.

601 Walnut St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://historicphiladelphia.org

Founded in 1994 at the direction of Governor Edward G. Rendell, then Philadelphia’s mayor, Historic Philadelphia, Inc.’s (HPI) mission is to make our nation’s history relevant and real through interpretation, interaction, and education, strengthening Greater Philadelphia’s role as the destination to experience American History. To serve this mission HPI manages, programs, and maintains three properties including the Betsy Ross House, Franklin Square and Once Upon a Nation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-philadelphia-inc.jpeg
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
London Transport Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London Transport Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Philadelphia, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — London Transport Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London Transport Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Philadelphia, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Philadelphia, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-philadelphia-inc.jpeg
Historic Philadelphia, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

London Transport Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to London Transport Museum company.

In the current year, Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company and London Transport Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

London Transport Museum company employs more people globally than Historic Philadelphia, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Historic Philadelphia, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References