Comparison Overview

London House Chambers

VS

Catalyst Repository Systems

London House Chambers

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

London House Chambers is a full service law firm located in Guyana with a global reach. It is the only international law firm in Guyana bringing together the collective experience of established Guyana and international attorneys practicing throughout the Caribbean, England and New York. We provide a comprehensive range of legal, corporate, trademark, patent and agency services in Guyana to a diverse range of clients, working closely with a local and global network of professionals to quickly solve any dilemma. In an industry built on hype, we define ourselves by expertise, responsiveness, integrity, dedication and success. Whatever the challenge, our attorneys are ready to advise you in your every endeavour in Guyana and beyond.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Catalyst Repository Systems

1860 Blake Street, Denver, CO, 80202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Catalyst designs, builds and supports the world’s fastest and most powerful e-discovery platform. For 20 years, Catalyst has helped global corporations and their law firms reduce the total cost of discovery and take control of complex, large-scale discovery and regulatory compliance.To learn more, visit catalystsecure.com or follow us on Twitter at @CatalystSecure.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-house-chambers.jpeg
London House Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-repository-systems.jpeg
Catalyst Repository Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
London House Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Catalyst Repository Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London House Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalyst Repository Systems in 2025.

Incident History — London House Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London House Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Catalyst Repository Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalyst Repository Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-house-chambers.jpeg
London House Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-repository-systems.jpeg
Catalyst Repository Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both London House Chambers company and Catalyst Repository Systems company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Catalyst Repository Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to London House Chambers company.

In the current year, Catalyst Repository Systems company and London House Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Catalyst Repository Systems company nor London House Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Catalyst Repository Systems company nor London House Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Catalyst Repository Systems company nor London House Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither London House Chambers company nor Catalyst Repository Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither London House Chambers company nor Catalyst Repository Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Catalyst Repository Systems company employs more people globally than London House Chambers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither London House Chambers nor Catalyst Repository Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X