Comparison Overview

LOKTAH Photo Lab

VS

C&D Printing - A BR Company

LOKTAH Photo Lab

361 Exchange St., West Monroe, Louisiana, 71292, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.loktah.com

LOKTAH was founded back in 2008 with a desire to create natural packaging for our own clients unlike anything seen before and not have to spend countless hours in photoshop designing case inserts for those plastic cases we all know and don't care for, we later decided to open LOKTAH with that single idea and share that thought to the photographic and videography industries. Since the birth of LOKTAH it has always been a desire to continue the growth of LOKTAH and share our unique look on how eco-friendly packaging doesn't have to be ugly but it can actually be a stunning work of art. We at LOKTAH strive to always serve you the customer and make you're experience with us a positive and unique experience. As the LOKTAH team grows and the our line expands we promise to always uphold to the highest quality standards and more than anything provide you the best customer service. Join us on the journey!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

C&D Printing - A BR Company

550 E 76th Ave, Denver, Colorado, 80229, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cdprinting.net/

C&D Printing, an accredited Union Print Shop, has over 30 years of expertise in utilizing innovative print methods to bring your message to the hands of millions of existing and new customers. We strive to build lasting relationships with our customers by providing excellent service and producing quality products at an economic price. By communicating with you every step of the way, we enhance quality control and a positive experience from concept to completion. With our Environmental Leadership Award for 2016-2017, we are thrilled to diversify our value to the community and our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loktah.jpeg
LOKTAH Photo Lab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&d-printing-inc-.jpeg
C&D Printing - A BR Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LOKTAH Photo Lab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
C&D Printing - A BR Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LOKTAH Photo Lab in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&D Printing - A BR Company in 2025.

Incident History — LOKTAH Photo Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LOKTAH Photo Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — C&D Printing - A BR Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&D Printing - A BR Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loktah.jpeg
LOKTAH Photo Lab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c&d-printing-inc-.jpeg
C&D Printing - A BR Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LOKTAH Photo Lab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to C&D Printing - A BR Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, C&D Printing - A BR Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LOKTAH Photo Lab company.

In the current year, C&D Printing - A BR Company company and LOKTAH Photo Lab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company company nor LOKTAH Photo Lab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company company nor LOKTAH Photo Lab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither C&D Printing - A BR Company company nor LOKTAH Photo Lab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab company nor C&D Printing - A BR Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

C&D Printing - A BR Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LOKTAH Photo Lab company.

C&D Printing - A BR Company company employs more people globally than LOKTAH Photo Lab company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LOKTAH Photo Lab nor C&D Printing - A BR Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References