Comparison Overview

Loftwall

VS

Enwork

Loftwall

2617 N Great Southwest Pkwy, Grand Prairie, Texas, 75050, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.loftwall.com

We believe our world is short on privacy. We’ve read it in studies, we’ve heard it from customers and we’ve lived it ourselves. So, we’re doing something about it. As manufacturers of colorful, flexible privacy, we bring focus spaces to life through data-driven design. An Inc. 5000 "Fastest-Growing Company" and a Fort Worth Inc. "Best Company to Work For".

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Enwork

12900 Christopher Drive, None, Lowell, Michigan, US, 49331
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://enwork.com/

You can tell a lot about a company by the company it keeps. Here at Enwork, we work with clients that are leaders in productivity, innovation, intuitive design and creative thinking - clients like Tesla, AirBnB, Lyft, Yeti and Netflix. These organizations want workspaces that not only meet their needs for agility and productivity but also reflect their innovative values and culture. It's why they come to Enwork. At Enwork, we stay ahead of trends to anticipate how to best optimize spaces, and design with creative forethought into how things can adapt for the future. Our products are created using a variety of material choices that beautifully prove their long-term value. We understand that what our clients invest in today must work for tomorrow. We service our clients with the same focus on speed and agility. Our product development is rapid, our processes are adaptive and our teams are always on high alert. It's why we can count many fast-moving firms among our valued clients, and it's why we continue to grow at a record-breaking pace.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loftwall.jpeg
Loftwall
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enwork.jpeg
Enwork
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Loftwall
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enwork
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Loftwall in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enwork in 2025.

Incident History — Loftwall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loftwall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enwork (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enwork cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loftwall.jpeg
Loftwall
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enwork.jpeg
Enwork
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Loftwall company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enwork company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Enwork company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Loftwall company has not reported any.

In the current year, Enwork company and Loftwall company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Enwork company nor Loftwall company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Enwork company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Loftwall company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Enwork company nor Loftwall company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Loftwall company nor Enwork company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Loftwall company nor Enwork company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Enwork company employs more people globally than Loftwall company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Loftwall nor Enwork holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References