Comparison Overview

Loftus Engineering, Inc.

VS

Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox)

Loftus Engineering, Inc.

201 South Capitol Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Loftus Engineering is an Indianapolis-based WBE, full service mechanical and electrical consulting engineering firm, specializing in unique, complex and sustainable building projects. We serve the higher education, K-12, healthcare, municipal, research and transportation markets in Indiana and the surrounding states. Our staff consists of licensed professional engineers, Healthcare Facility Design (HFDP) professionals, ,LEED accredited professionals, & lighting certified professionals. Services: • Mechanical Engineering • Electrical Engineering • Plumbing Engineering • Telecommunications Design • Construction Administration • Consulting Services Certifications: • WBE Certified and DBE Certified • Licensed Professional Engineers • HFDP Accreditation through ASHRAE • LEED Accredited Professionals • Lighting Certified Professionals

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox)

None
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Fabric Duct Systems, Inc. engineers and manufactures Q-Sox® brand fabric duct for HVAC/R air distribution. Q-Sox fabric ductwork is an attractive, natural convection system providing low/no draft, evenly distributed supply air. Q-Sox is a proven solution for better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and air circulation in Pools, Gymnasiums, Museums, Warehouses, Schools, Churches, Supermarkets, Restaurants, Auditoriums, and Production Environments. Q-Sox: QUICK installation; QUIET operation; QUIET operation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loftus-engineering-inc..jpeg
Loftus Engineering, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabric-duct-systems-q-sox-.jpeg
Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Loftus Engineering, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Loftus Engineering, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) in 2025.

Incident History — Loftus Engineering, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loftus Engineering, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loftus-engineering-inc..jpeg
Loftus Engineering, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fabric-duct-systems-q-sox-.jpeg
Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Loftus Engineering, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Loftus Engineering, Inc. company.

In the current year, Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company and Loftus Engineering, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company nor Loftus Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company nor Loftus Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company nor Loftus Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. company nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. company nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Loftus Engineering, Inc. company employs more people globally than Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Loftus Engineering, Inc. nor Fabric Duct Systems (Q-Sox) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H