Comparison Overview

Lockbits SpA

VS

Palo Alto Networks

Lockbits SpA

República de Honduras., Santiago, CL
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.lockbits.cl

Lockbits es una compañía chilena de seguridad informática que comercializa software de terceros (ESET, Microsoft) a través de un modelo de partnership, y que brinda valor a través de servicios de seguridad, de un excelente asesoramiento de venta consultiva y, a través de su servicio de post venta que es lo que los diferencia de la competencia, ya que brindan un servicio de elevada calidad y atención.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Palo Alto Networks

3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749
http://www.paloaltonetworks.com

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest security challenges with continuous innovation that seizes the latest breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, analytics, automation, and orchestration. By delivering an integrated platform and empowering a growing ecosystem of partners, we are at the forefront of protecting tens of thousands of organizations across clouds, networks, and mobile devices. Our vision is a world where each day is safer and more secure than the one before. For more information, visit www.paloaltonetworks.com.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,620
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lockbitscl.jpeg
Lockbits SpA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-networks.jpeg
Palo Alto Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lockbits SpA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palo Alto Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lockbits SpA in 2026.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

Palo Alto Networks has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Lockbits SpA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockbits SpA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lockbitscl.jpeg
Lockbits SpA
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: social engineering, zero-day exploit, DLL sideloading, OAuth abuse, credential harvesting, phone-based impersonation, vulnerability exploitation
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palo-alto-networks.jpeg
Palo Alto Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated remote exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-based (no authentication or user interaction required)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vulnerability Exploitation, OAuth Token Theft, Salesforce Integration Abuse
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Phishing/Follow-on Attacks, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Palo Alto Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lockbits SpA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Palo Alto Networks company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Lockbits SpA company.

In the current year, Palo Alto Networks company has reported more cyber incidents than Lockbits SpA company.

Lockbits SpA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Palo Alto Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Palo Alto Networks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Lockbits SpA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Palo Alto Networks company nor Lockbits SpA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Palo Alto Networks company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lockbits SpA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Palo Alto Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lockbits SpA company.

Palo Alto Networks company employs more people globally than Lockbits SpA company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lockbits SpA nor Palo Alto Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References