Comparison Overview

Location Photography

VS

Studio 57 Photography

Location Photography

111 Hollywood Ave., East Orange, NJ, 07018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15

Welcome to Location Photography Location Photography based in New Jersey, Location Photography was founded July of 1987 by Mr. Barry Gray. Its New Jersey location affords it the flexibility to efficiently service the Tri-State area. Mr. Gray’s vast experience, training, and education in the photography industry has enabled him to provide an array of photography services to all types of customers. Commercial, industrial, educational, portfolios, & brochures are a few of the many services available. With over twenty-five years of experience in the photography industry, he possesses the skills to also consult and teach. Location photography provides a complete range of professional photographic services to all, for all occasions and both the private and public sectors.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio 57 Photography

undefined, Indianapolis, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Premiere Photography Studio, specializing in Maternity, Newborn, and High School Seniors, and Glamour photography. Studio 57 has a spacious, fully equipped studio or we can go on location, it's your call. We pride ourselves on offering each client a unique and enjoyable experience, as well as top notch high quality work.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/location-photography.jpeg
Location Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-57-photography.jpeg
Studio 57 Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Location Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio 57 Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Location Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 57 Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Location Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Location Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio 57 Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 57 Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/location-photography.jpeg
Location Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-57-photography.jpeg
Studio 57 Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Location Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio 57 Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio 57 Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Location Photography company.

In the current year, Studio 57 Photography company and Location Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio 57 Photography company nor Location Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio 57 Photography company nor Location Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio 57 Photography company nor Location Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Location Photography company nor Studio 57 Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Location Photography company nor Studio 57 Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Studio 57 Photography company employs more people globally than Location Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Location Photography nor Studio 57 Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N