Comparison Overview

Local Government NSW

VS

Meramec Regional Planning Commission

Local Government NSW

Level 8, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://lgnsw.org.au

Local Government NSW is the peak organisation that represents the interests of NSW general and special purpose councils. LGNSW aims to strengthen and protect an effective, democratic system of local government across NSW by supporting and advocating on behalf of member councils and delivering a range of relevant, quality services. LGNSW achieves this by: • Actively and persuasively representing the views of local government to the NSW and Australian governments • Providing effective, responsive and accountable leadership to member councils • Providing a comprehensive range of high-quality services and policy advice to members • Increasing the capacity of local government to deliver quality services and meet the needs of local communities across NSW • Enhancing the profile and building community trust in and awareness of local government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 243
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Meramec Regional Planning Commission

4 Industrial Dr, St James, MO, 65559, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://meramecregion.org

The Mission of MRPC is to enhance the quality of life for residents of the Meramec Region. In pursuit of this mission, MRPC will bring about results in these areas: Cleaner, healthier and safer communities. Greater socio-economic and cultural wealth through community and economic development, and A stronger, unified voice in the legislative process.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/local-government-nsw.jpeg
Local Government NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meramec-regional-planning-commission.jpeg
Meramec Regional Planning Commission
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Local Government NSW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meramec Regional Planning Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Local Government NSW in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meramec Regional Planning Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Local Government NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Local Government NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meramec Regional Planning Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meramec Regional Planning Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/local-government-nsw.jpeg
Local Government NSW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meramec-regional-planning-commission.jpeg
Meramec Regional Planning Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meramec Regional Planning Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Local Government NSW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Meramec Regional Planning Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Local Government NSW company.

In the current year, Meramec Regional Planning Commission company and Local Government NSW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Meramec Regional Planning Commission company nor Local Government NSW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Meramec Regional Planning Commission company nor Local Government NSW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meramec Regional Planning Commission company nor Local Government NSW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Local Government NSW company nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Local Government NSW company nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Local Government NSW company employs more people globally than Meramec Regional Planning Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Local Government NSW nor Meramec Regional Planning Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References