Comparison Overview

Surrey Social Stock Photography

VS

Stockland Martel

Surrey Social Stock Photography

undefined, Guildford, Surrey, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.surreysocialstockphotography.com/

We are a Surrey photographer duo delivering professional business, commercial and personal brand photography. With over 12 years of experience in creating gorgeous imagery for small independent businesses, our speciality is brand and small business photography. We’d like to help you elevate the online presence of your website and your social media by creating a bespoke bank of images that will ultimately be the shop window of your business. This isn’t just about your products and services; it’s about the story behind them and the story behind you. We take time to capture the real you behind your brand and really bring it to life, so you can target your ideal customers, boost your sales and move your business forward. We'd like to help you elevate the online presence of your website and your social media by creating a bespoke bank of images that will ultimately be the shop window of your business. This isn't just about your products and services, it's about the story behind them and the story behind you. We take time to capture the real you behind your brand and really bring it to life, so you can target your ideal customers, boost your sales and move your business forward.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stockland Martel

343 E. 18th St., New York, NY, 10003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749
http://stocklandmartel.com

Stockland Martel represents photographers and stylists known for their creativity, expertise, and unique point of view. See more: stocklandmartel.com, stocklandmartelblog.com. Facebook: @representingphotographers Instagram: @stockland_martel Twitter: stocklandmartel Current photography roster: Melanie Acevedo Kwaku Alston Fulvio Bonavia Brinson+Banks Jimmy Chin Matthias Clamer Nigel Cox Uwe Duettmann Jim Fiscus Lauren Greenfield Timothy Greenfield-Sanders Guzman Tobias Hutzler Walter Iooss Steven Lippman Jeff Lipsky Annabel Mehran Miller Mobley Michael Muller Nino Muñoz Matthew Rolston Martin Sigal Jan Steinhilber Art Streiber

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockland-martel.jpeg
Stockland Martel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Surrey Social Stock Photography
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stockland Martel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Surrey Social Stock Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stockland Martel in 2025.

Incident History — Surrey Social Stock Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Surrey Social Stock Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stockland Martel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stockland Martel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lobler-&-delaney.jpeg
Surrey Social Stock Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stockland-martel.jpeg
Stockland Martel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Surrey Social Stock Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stockland Martel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stockland Martel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Surrey Social Stock Photography company.

In the current year, Stockland Martel company and Surrey Social Stock Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stockland Martel company nor Surrey Social Stock Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stockland Martel company nor Surrey Social Stock Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stockland Martel company nor Surrey Social Stock Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography company nor Stockland Martel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography company nor Stockland Martel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stockland Martel company employs more people globally than Surrey Social Stock Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Surrey Social Stock Photography nor Stockland Martel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References