Comparison Overview

Lloyds Banking Group

VS

Primerica

Lloyds Banking Group

25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/

Our purpose is Helping Britain Prosper. We do this by creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for people and businesses, shaping finance as a force for good. We're part of an ever-changing industry and are currently on a journey to shape the financial services of the future, whilst supporting our customers’ changing needs. The scale and reach of our Group means we can offer a broad range of opportunities to learn, grow and develop. Our values-led culture and approach to inclusion and diversity means we can all make a real difference together.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 62,601
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Primerica

1 Primerica Parkway, Duluth, 30099-0001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://bit.ly/PrimericaDisclosures

Primerica is a leading provider of financial products and services in North America, with over 2,800 corporate employees who support over 151,000 licensed independent representatives providing financial education and offering financial products and services to their clients. Primerica was founded 48 years ago and is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol "PRI". Primerica’s focus is on serving the needs of middle-income families by providing products such as term life insurance, mutual funds, annuities, and mortgages. In addition to the products and services we offer, Primerica also offers entrepreneurial-minded individuals the opportunity to build their own financial services business. More information about Primerica's Business Opportunity can be found on www.primericabusinessopportunity.com. Headquartered in Duluth, GA, Primerica operates throughout the U.S., Canada, and the territories of Puerto Rico and Guam. We believe financial security should be possible for everyone, so we strive to meet families where they are today and help them be better prepared for their future.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17,641
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primerica.jpeg
Primerica
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lloyds Banking Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Primerica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lloyds Banking Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Primerica in 2026.

Incident History — Lloyds Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lloyds Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Primerica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Primerica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2006
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primerica.jpeg
Primerica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lloyds Banking Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Primerica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lloyds Banking Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Primerica company has not reported any.

In the current year, Primerica company and Lloyds Banking Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Primerica company nor Lloyds Banking Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Lloyds Banking Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Primerica company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Primerica company nor Lloyds Banking Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor Primerica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor Primerica company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lloyds Banking Group company employs more people globally than Primerica company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group nor Primerica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References