Comparison Overview

Lloyd Grey

VS

Seaberry Design & Communications

Lloyd Grey

50 Gordon Street, Hawthorne, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4171
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lloydgrey.com.au

Lloyd Grey Design is one of Australia’s leading branding and creative agencies with more than 25 years’ outstanding experience. We work with select companies and organisations to help them discover their brand essence and make a difference in their world. It’s an in-depth process that transforms everything through a renewed sense of purpose and clarity. Our brand development method builds long-term market differentiation, increases sales, nurtures customer loyalty, enhances employee engagement and captures a compelling position with unique and timeless design. We help you connect with your audience and resonate with authenticity in a crowded world.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Seaberry Design & Communications

2000 P Street NW, Suite 510, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749
http://www.seaberrydesign.com

Show up like you mean business. At Seaberry, we help businesses, institutions, and organizations communicate with clarity, confidence, and purpose. That means branding, websites, publications, video, and all the visual strategies that help our clients look, feel, and communicate like the powerhouses they are. We support organizations at pivotal moments—launching something new, refreshing their identity, or rethinking how they connect with their audience. Our work spans identity design, websites, social media, sales, event and conference collateral, publication design, and video content that turns vision into action. What makes us different? We don’t just design—we think. We understand the mindset of business owners, agency leads, and mission-driven leaders who are building in real time, wearing multiple hats, and doing work that truly matters. We’ve been there too. In the trenches. That’s why our team isn’t just creative—it’s strategic, responsive, and deeply invested in your success. Unlike agencies that rely heavily on freelancers, Seaberry is powered by a consistent, in-house creative team. That means lower turnover, stronger relationships, and sharper, more consistent results for our clients. We bring structure and speed, but also insight and partnership. We’re here to help you shape a bold, meaningful, and unmistakable brand presence. You mean business. So do we. Let’s build something that lasts—by design. calendly.com/Seaberry-graphic-design

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyd-grey.jpeg
Lloyd Grey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seaberry-design-&-communications.jpeg
Seaberry Design & Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lloyd Grey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seaberry Design & Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lloyd Grey in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seaberry Design & Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Lloyd Grey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lloyd Grey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seaberry Design & Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seaberry Design & Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyd-grey.jpeg
Lloyd Grey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seaberry-design-&-communications.jpeg
Seaberry Design & Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lloyd Grey company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seaberry Design & Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seaberry Design & Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lloyd Grey company.

In the current year, Seaberry Design & Communications company and Lloyd Grey company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seaberry Design & Communications company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seaberry Design & Communications company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seaberry Design & Communications company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lloyd Grey company nor Seaberry Design & Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lloyd Grey company nor Seaberry Design & Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seaberry Design & Communications company employs more people globally than Lloyd Grey company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Seaberry Design & Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References