Comparison Overview

Lloyd Grey

VS

Minty

Lloyd Grey

50 Gordon Street, Hawthorne, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4171
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Lloyd Grey Design is one of Australia’s leading branding and creative agencies with more than 25 years’ outstanding experience. We work with select companies and organisations to help them discover their brand essence and make a difference in their world. It’s an in-depth process that transforms everything through a renewed sense of purpose and clarity. Our brand development method builds long-term market differentiation, increases sales, nurtures customer loyalty, enhances employee engagement and captures a compelling position with unique and timeless design. We help you connect with your audience and resonate with authenticity in a crowded world.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Minty

Balkerne House, Balkerne Passage, Colchester, Essex, CO11PA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We are a small boutique design agency who offer passion and sophistication to both graphic design and web development. Minty was founded in 2012 by Gerben van Amstel and Kelly Wright out of passion for delightful branding and digital products. Now located in the Netherlands, we help small and large businesses across the world to elevate their brands and digital presence through memorable user experiences.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyd-grey.jpeg
Lloyd Grey
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mintystudios.jpeg
Minty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lloyd Grey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lloyd Grey in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minty in 2025.

Incident History — Lloyd Grey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lloyd Grey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyd-grey.jpeg
Lloyd Grey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mintystudios.jpeg
Minty
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Minty company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lloyd Grey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minty company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lloyd Grey company.

In the current year, Minty company and Lloyd Grey company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minty company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minty company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minty company nor Lloyd Grey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lloyd Grey company nor Minty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lloyd Grey company nor Minty company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Minty company employs more people globally than Lloyd Grey company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lloyd Grey nor Minty holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X