Liya International
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
None
NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Liya International
VS
Nippon Steel Corporation
Nippon Steel Corporation
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
＜Nippon Steel Corporation does not recognize this account as OFFICIAL, but it is open for LinkedIn subscribers.＞ On April 1, 2019, we renamed ourselves as “Nippon Steel Corporation” (from Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation), to keep in pace with our advance as a growing global steelmaker with origins in Japan.
NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 695
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Liya International
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Nippon Steel Corporation
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Liya International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nippon Steel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Liya International in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nippon Steel Corporation in 2026.
Incident History — Liya International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Liya International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Nippon Steel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nippon Steel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Liya International
Incidents
No Incident
Nippon Steel Corporation
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Nippon Steel Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Liya International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Historically, Nippon Steel Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Liya International company.
In the current year, Nippon Steel Corporation company and Liya International company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Liya International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Liya International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither Nippon Steel Corporation company nor Liya International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Liya International company nor Nippon Steel Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Neither Liya International company nor Nippon Steel Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
Nippon Steel Corporation company employs more people globally than Liya International company, reflecting its scale as a Machinery Manufacturing.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Liya International nor Nippon Steel Corporation holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description
The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.
Description
XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services
Description
Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.
Description
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.
