Comparison Overview

Le Livre de Poche

VS

Figshare

Le Livre de Poche

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Le Livre de Poche, détenu à 60 % par Hachette Livre et à 40 % par Albin Michel, est le premier éditeur de format poche en France avec plus d’un milliard d’exemplaires vendus depuis sa création en 1953 et plus de 5 500 titres actifs. L’atout de cette maison, qui accueille aussi des éditeurs tiers, réside dans la grande diversité de son catalogue, qui s’adresse à tous les publics. Le Livre de Poche couvre en effet un large spectre littéraire, des grands classiques (J.R.R. Tolkien, Boris Vian, Stefan Zweig, etc.) aux best-sellers contemporains français et étrangers (Guillaume Musso, Grégoire Delacourt, Pierre Lemaitre, Amélie Nothomb, Katherine Pancol, Michael Connelly, Dan Brown, Victoria Hislop, E.L. James, et bien d’autres), des livres pratiques aux essais et ouvrages de référence (Dale Carnegie, Claude Halmos, Frédéric Lenoir, etc.). Le Livre de Poche édite également des textes inédits d’auteurs de son catalogue comme Tatiana de Rosnay, Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt, Bernard Werber, et a l’ambition de faire découvrir de nouveaux auteurs français ou étrangers sous le label Préludes. La maison d’édition a développé un catalogue numérique qui compte à ce jour plus de 650 titres, parmi lesquels des classiques, des inédits avec bonus (fin alternative pour la version numérique de Tu me plais de Jacques Expert), des ouvrages enrichis de versions sonores intégrées (Pratique de la méditation de Fabrice Midal), des textes de Ken Follett, Stephen King, Patricia Cornwell et Pierre Lemaitre. Année de création : 1953 Catalogue : 5 500 titres Nouveautés : 400 titres par an

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Figshare

Digital Science, London, N1 9XW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

"Get credit for all of your research."​ Scientific publishing as it stands is an inefficient way to do science on a global scale. A lot of time and money is being wasted by groups around the world duplicating research that has already been carried out. FigShare allows you to share all of your data, negative results and unpublished figures. In doing this, other researchers will not duplicate the work, but instead may publish with your previously wasted figures, or offer collaboration opportunities and feedback on preprint figures.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/livre-de-poche.jpeg
Le Livre de Poche
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/figshare.jpeg
Figshare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Le Livre de Poche
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Figshare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Le Livre de Poche in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Figshare in 2025.

Incident History — Le Livre de Poche (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Le Livre de Poche cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Figshare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Figshare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/livre-de-poche.jpeg
Le Livre de Poche
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/figshare.jpeg
Figshare
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to data security system
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Le Livre de Poche company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Figshare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Figshare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Le Livre de Poche company has not reported any.

In the current year, Figshare company and Le Livre de Poche company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Figshare company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Le Livre de Poche company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Figshare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Le Livre de Poche company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Figshare company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Le Livre de Poche company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Le Livre de Poche company nor Figshare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Le Livre de Poche company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Figshare company.

Le Livre de Poche company employs more people globally than Figshare company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Le Livre de Poche nor Figshare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.