Comparison Overview

LTP

VS

Copyright Licensing Agency

LTP

3949 S Racine Ave, Chicago, IL, 60609, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

LTP is a premier publisher of liturgical and pastoral materials in English and Spanish. Established by the Archdiocese of Chicago in 1964, LTP promotes the liturgical formation of the faithful called for by the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council. Dedicated to developing resources for the assembly, clergy, liturgical ministers, and all who study the liturgy, LTP produces books, videos, workshops, and other training materials so all the faithful may “become thoroughly imbued with the spirit and power of the liturgy” (SC, 14).

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Copyright Licensing Agency

1 St Katharine's Way, London, E1W 1UN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

As a not-for-profit company, we distribute our revenues back into the creative industries helping to ensure rights holders are fairly remunerated when their works are used. CLA is recognised by the UK government as the collective management organisation for published material. We exist to support knowledge sharing, protect your company, and champion the creative ecosystem. Our revenue is distributed to our member organisations who pay royalties directly to copyright owners – authors (ALCS), publishers (PLS), and visual artists (DACS & PICSEL).

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liturgy-training-publications.jpeg
LTP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LTP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Copyright Licensing Agency
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LTP in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copyright Licensing Agency in 2025.

Incident History — LTP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LTP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Copyright Licensing Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copyright Licensing Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liturgy-training-publications.jpeg
LTP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copyright-licensing-agency.jpeg
Copyright Licensing Agency
Incidents

FAQ

LTP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Copyright Licensing Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Copyright Licensing Agency company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LTP company.

In the current year, Copyright Licensing Agency company and LTP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency company nor LTP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency company nor LTP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency company nor LTP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LTP company nor Copyright Licensing Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LTP company nor Copyright Licensing Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Copyright Licensing Agency company employs more people globally than LTP company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LTP nor Copyright Licensing Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.