Comparison Overview

Liturgical Press

VS

Charleston Law Review

Liturgical Press

2950 St John's Rd, Collegeville, Minnesota, 56321, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.litpress.org

Liturgical Press began publishing for the Church in 1926. Since then, our dedicated staff continues to sustain our original mission of proclaiming the Good News of Jesus Christ. We are truly committed to providing religious and spiritual resources of the highest relevance and quality to the Christian community. As we strive to carry on the great tradition of Liturgical Press under the guidance of our Lord and St. John’s Abbey, we thank you for your faithful support and look forward to serving you in the many years to come.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Charleston Law Review

81 Mary St, None, Charleston, South Carolina, US, 29403
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
https://charlestonlaw.edu/charleston-law-review/

The Charleston Law Review is an independent organization composed entirely of upper-level students at the Charleston School of Law. In order to gain membership on the Charleston Law Review, first year students must compete in a writing competition that begins after spring semester finals have concluded. The Charleston Law Review then makes membership offers to students based on a combination of grades and the scored writing piece. The Charleston Law Review recruits the best and brightest students from the Charleston School of Law. The Law Review’s primary objective is to foster the knowledge and insight of students, practitioners, scholars, and the judiciary through a traditional forum dedicated to augmenting the pursuit of innovative legal expression, composition, and scholarship. Members of the Law Review contribute to this objective by editing articles, writing notes, and actively participating all aspects of the publication process.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liturgical-press.jpeg
Liturgical Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-law-review.jpeg
Charleston Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Liturgical Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charleston Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liturgical Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Liturgical Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liturgical Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charleston Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liturgical-press.jpeg
Liturgical Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-law-review.jpeg
Charleston Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Liturgical Press company and Charleston Law Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Charleston Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Liturgical Press company.

In the current year, Charleston Law Review company and Liturgical Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Liturgical Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Liturgical Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charleston Law Review company nor Liturgical Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Liturgical Press company nor Charleston Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Liturgical Press company nor Charleston Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Liturgical Press company employs more people globally than Charleston Law Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Liturgical Press nor Charleston Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References