Comparison Overview

little blue deer

VS

PWL Studio

little blue deer

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Little Blue Deer offers elegant, customized blog and boutique website design, as well as logo and print advertising. Shari Miller, the owner and inspiration behind Little Blue Deer, has over 10 years of experience in public relations, marketing and graphic design, and is a graduate of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PWL Studio

1636 Richmond Avenue, Houston, Texas, 77006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to PWL Studio, a modern and innovative full-service creative firm based in Houston, Texas. We understand the challenges of small business owners and aim to help them achieve their marketing goals with ease. Our expert team of graphic and web designers, photographers, and brand developers utilize the latest marketing automation systems to save our clients valuable time, money, and energy. With our full suite of services, we work closely with our clients to create a tailored and effective marketing strategy that stands out in today's crowded media landscape. By maximizing every opportunity, our team ensures that your brand's message is communicated effectively and reaches your target audience. Let us help you grow your business and reach new heights. Contact us today!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwl-studio.jpeg
PWL Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
little blue deer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PWL Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for little blue deer in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PWL Studio in 2025.

Incident History — little blue deer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

little blue deer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PWL Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PWL Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwl-studio.jpeg
PWL Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

little blue deer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PWL Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PWL Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to little blue deer company.

In the current year, PWL Studio company and little blue deer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PWL Studio company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PWL Studio company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PWL Studio company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither little blue deer company nor PWL Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither little blue deer company nor PWL Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PWL Studio company employs more people globally than little blue deer company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither little blue deer nor PWL Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X