Comparison Overview

little blue deer

VS

Paint the Town Graphics, Inc

little blue deer

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Little Blue Deer offers elegant, customized blog and boutique website design, as well as logo and print advertising. Shari Miller, the owner and inspiration behind Little Blue Deer, has over 10 years of experience in public relations, marketing and graphic design, and is a graduate of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Paint the Town Graphics, Inc

1828 W Main St, Fort Wayne, IN 46808, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We can print a wide variety of signs, vehicle graphics, banners, and custom projects. If you have an idea but aren't sure how to get it across we have design services to help with that. Not sure that we can do what you're looking for? Give us a call or pop over and see us! We have 29 years of experience and a well stocked candy dish.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paint-the-town-graphics.jpeg
Paint the Town Graphics, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
little blue deer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paint the Town Graphics, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for little blue deer in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paint the Town Graphics, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — little blue deer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

little blue deer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paint the Town Graphics, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paint the Town Graphics, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-blue-deer.jpeg
little blue deer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paint-the-town-graphics.jpeg
Paint the Town Graphics, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

little blue deer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to little blue deer company.

In the current year, Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company and little blue deer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company nor little blue deer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither little blue deer company nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither little blue deer company nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paint the Town Graphics, Inc company employs more people globally than little blue deer company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither little blue deer nor Paint the Town Graphics, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X