Comparison Overview

Lithtex Printing Solutions

VS

Richmark Label

Lithtex Printing Solutions

6770 NE Century Blvd, Hillsboro, Oregon, 97124, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

THE POWER OF PRINT Celebrating over 45 years in business, Lithtex has been the Pacific Northwest's top source for quality offset and digital print with 28"​ and 40"​ six color presses equipped with Aqueous and/or UV coatings. Large digital department with Indigo + Xerox 700 (variable print / mail merge), Canon + Docutech high speed equipment complements our range of services. We provide our customers with superior print services PLUS in-house packaging, mailing, kitting, fulfillment, storage, pick 'n pak, and distribution from Portland's most modern print plant, located in Oregon's high-tech "silicon forest"​ area. Many in-house finishing services that other local printers have to buyout to vendors allowing us to keep costs low, maintain quality and adhere to sensitive timelines. Lithtex is a G7 Master Printer. G7 Methodology allows superior color matching from proof to press, press to press, printer to printer. Serving local, out of state and international Customers from our 50,000 sq ft plant. For out of state buyers, no sales tax in Oregon. See us at www.lithtex.com or call 503-641-5367.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Richmark Label

1110 E Pine St, Seattle, WA, 98122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Richmark Label is an award-winning label printer of high-quality custom labels, stickers and tape. * Water Bottle Labels * Wine Labels * Food Labels * Beer Labels The company's has ten quick-change flexographic (flexo) presses, capable of printing line or screen work from one to ten colors, and two large digital presses, capable of five colors. Printing includes product labels of many varieties: bottle labels, food labels (including for frozen food labels), water resistant labels, pouches and labels for flexible packaging. We print a variety of promotional style labels, coupons, ReseaLabels, liner and adhesive printed labels, imprintable labels (able to be printed upon by by thermal and other processes). We use standard commercial ink and UV ink as well as in-line and off-line hot foil stamping and embossing. Maximum label dimensions are 13 inches by 24 inches. Our delivery formats include roll labels, sheet labels and labels on fanfold sheets. We also print serialized labels (consecutively numbered labels) as well stickers and tape using all of the previously outlined capabilities. Richmark Label is a seventy-year-old corporation located in the Capitol Hill district of Seattle. With a 50,000 square foot facility working two shifts, Richmark prints over 300,000,000 (300 million) labels annually to serve the needs of customers in all fifty states and a number of other countries. Using a combination of expertise built over decades and plenty of old fashioned hard work, Richmark delivers great value and quality to its customers. Richmark is a registered trademark of The Richmark Company, a Washington corporation. The Richmark Company does business as Richmark Label. Toll Free: 800.456.8884 Email: [email protected] Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RichmarkLabel Twitter: https://twitter.com/RichmarkLabel

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lithtex-printing-solutions.jpeg
Lithtex Printing Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmark-label.jpeg
Richmark Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lithtex Printing Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Richmark Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lithtex Printing Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richmark Label in 2025.

Incident History — Lithtex Printing Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lithtex Printing Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Richmark Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richmark Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lithtex-printing-solutions.jpeg
Lithtex Printing Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richmark-label.jpeg
Richmark Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lithtex Printing Solutions company and Richmark Label company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Richmark Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lithtex Printing Solutions company.

In the current year, Richmark Label company and Lithtex Printing Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Richmark Label company nor Lithtex Printing Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Richmark Label company nor Lithtex Printing Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Richmark Label company nor Lithtex Printing Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions company nor Richmark Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Richmark Label company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lithtex Printing Solutions company.

Lithtex Printing Solutions company employs more people globally than Richmark Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lithtex Printing Solutions nor Richmark Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L