Comparison Overview

Litho Press, Inc.

VS

Rose City Label Co

Litho Press, Inc.

1747 E Massachusetts Ave, Indianapolis, 46201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lithopress.com

At Litho Press Inc., we make our clients’ lives easier by making the buying of labels and topsheets hassle-free and fun. We bring together top technology and talent to deliver your printing on time and picture-perfect. We will always answer your call, solve your problem, and be the printer you can trust. Our family-owned company has evolved to give you the best innovative products and customer experience but what will never change is how we treat our clients. Buyers become friends, Litho becomes family. And family takes care of family. Kick back, relax, and let Litho Press handle it. Fast, friendly, fine. Call 800-631-6468 or visit www.lithopress.com. #LithoPressInc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rose City Label Co

7235 Se Label Ln, Portland, OR, 97206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.labelprintingportland.com

High quality custom printing for anyone with food, beverage, cannabis or industrial labels. State of the art equipment, nationally recognized sustainability programs, and family values set us apart. - HP Indigo digital quality - Foil Stamping and embossing - Long run industrial and food labels - Backed by 92 years of family service You can always trust Rose City Label to guide you through your custom label printing project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-press-inc..jpeg
Litho Press, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-city-label-co.jpeg
Rose City Label Co
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Litho Press, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rose City Label Co
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Litho Press, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rose City Label Co in 2025.

Incident History — Litho Press, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Litho Press, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rose City Label Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rose City Label Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-press-inc..jpeg
Litho Press, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-city-label-co.jpeg
Rose City Label Co
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Litho Press, Inc. company and Rose City Label Co company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rose City Label Co company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Litho Press, Inc. company.

In the current year, Rose City Label Co company and Litho Press, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Litho Press, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Litho Press, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rose City Label Co company nor Litho Press, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. company nor Rose City Label Co company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. company nor Rose City Label Co company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Litho Press, Inc. company employs more people globally than Rose City Label Co company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Litho Press, Inc. nor Rose City Label Co holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References