Comparison Overview

Psychiatry UK

VS

Be Well Texas

Psychiatry UK

undefined, Online Service, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Psychiatry UK is the leading online psychiatric service – working to solve the mental health crisis. Psychiatry UK was founded in 2012 with a mission to remove the traditional barriers to mental health care and make support accessible to all. We provide specialist online psychiatric services to patients across the UK; connecting patients with expert clinicians who deliver the safe and trustworthy care they need. We treat a wide range of mental health issues including ADHD in adults and children, ASD in adults and children, Dementia and Memory Loss, Stress, Anxiety, Bipolar Disorder, Depression. Psychiatry UK is a Care Quality Commission regulated healthcare provider and our GMC registered psychiatrists offer diagnosis and treatment to patients, both privately and on behalf of the NHS. We are a qualified provider of adult ADHD and ASD services under the NHS Right to Choose (RTC) scheme.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Be Well Texas

San Antonio, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Be Well Texas, a grant program of UT Health San Antonio, is working to transform how people living with substance use, substance use disorder (SUD) and/or mental illness throughout Texas are cared for and treated. Our mission is to provide access to high-quality, low-barrier, evidence-based care throughout Texas by leveraging science, innovation and capacity building.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litfield-house.jpeg
Psychiatry UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bewelltexas.jpeg
Be Well Texas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Psychiatry UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Be Well Texas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psychiatry UK in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Be Well Texas in 2026.

Incident History — Psychiatry UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psychiatry UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Be Well Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Be Well Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litfield-house.jpeg
Psychiatry UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bewelltexas.jpeg
Be Well Texas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Psychiatry UK company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Be Well Texas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Be Well Texas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Psychiatry UK company.

In the current year, Be Well Texas company and Psychiatry UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Be Well Texas company nor Psychiatry UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Be Well Texas company nor Psychiatry UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Be Well Texas company nor Psychiatry UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Psychiatry UK company nor Be Well Texas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Psychiatry UK company nor Be Well Texas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Psychiatry UK company employs more people globally than Be Well Texas company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Psychiatry UK nor Be Well Texas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N