Comparison Overview

Lion Finance Group PLC

VS

Bank Alfalah Limited

Lion Finance Group PLC

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Lion Finance Group PLC (formerly Bank of Georgia Group PLC) is a FTSE 250 holding company, whose main operating subsidiaries are leading, customer-centric universal banks – Bank of Georgia in Georgia and Ameriabank in Armenia. Building on our competitive strengths, we drive business growth and maintain high profitability. We generate strong returns, create opportunities for our stakeholders, and make a positive impact in the communities where we operate.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bank Alfalah Limited

B.A. Building, I I Chundrigar Road, Karachi, PK
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Bank Alfalah is one of the largest private Banks in Pakistan with a network of over 1100 branches in more than 200 cities across Pakistan with an international presence in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bahrain, and a representative office in the UAE. The Bank is owned and operated by the Abu Dhabi Group. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank partnered with the Bank in 2014 and holds a 15 percent stake in Bank Alfalah. Incorporated as a public limited company on 21st June 1992, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, Bank Alfalah commenced banking operations from 1st November 1997. The Bank provides financial solutions to consumers, corporations, institutions, and governments through a broad spectrum of products and services, including corporate and investment banking, consumer banking and credit, securities brokerage, commercial, SME, agri-finance, Islamic and asset financing. JCR-VIS has assigned an entity rating of ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a stable outlook. PACRA has assigned Bank Alfalah ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) entity rating for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a positive outlook. The Bank is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 15,891
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lion-finance-group-plc.jpeg
Lion Finance Group PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lion Finance Group PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank Alfalah Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lion Finance Group PLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank Alfalah Limited in 2026.

Incident History — Lion Finance Group PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lion Finance Group PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank Alfalah Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank Alfalah Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lion-finance-group-plc.jpeg
Lion Finance Group PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lion Finance Group PLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank Alfalah Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bank Alfalah Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lion Finance Group PLC company.

In the current year, Bank Alfalah Limited company and Lion Finance Group PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Lion Finance Group PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Lion Finance Group PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Lion Finance Group PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bank Alfalah Limited company employs more people globally than Lion Finance Group PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lion Finance Group PLC nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H