Comparison Overview

Linux Academy

VS

Learning by Questions

Linux Academy

125 Bear Creek Pkwy, Keller, TX, 76248, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Empower your team or entire enterprise to Learn by Doing and stay ahead of the cloud technology curve. Linux Academy is the #1 multicloud Learn by Doing training platform. Over 50,000 people each month give us a 95% satisfaction rating. There’s simply no better way to train teams on revolutionary cloud technologies.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Learning by Questions

Philips Road, North West, England, BB1 5, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Learning by Questions is a multi award-winning classroom resource that improves education with a pedagogy based on timely feedback, interventions and reduces teacher workload. Students answer questions at their own pace. Wrong answers are always followed by instant feedback. This is constructive in nature and formulated to develop understanding and guide learning. When they answer correctly, students are moved to more challenging questions. Teachers get immediate insight into where they need to intervene, and feedback and intervention happen in the moment when the impact on learning and progress is greatest. Follow our X (@LBQorg) and Facebook (Learning by Questions) platforms for the latest updates.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linuxacademy.jpeg
Linux Academy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-by-questions.jpeg
Learning by Questions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Linux Academy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Learning by Questions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Linux Academy in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Learning by Questions in 2025.

Incident History — Linux Academy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Linux Academy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Learning by Questions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Learning by Questions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linuxacademy.jpeg
Linux Academy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/learning-by-questions.jpeg
Learning by Questions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Linux Academy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Learning by Questions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Learning by Questions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Linux Academy company.

In the current year, Learning by Questions company and Linux Academy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Learning by Questions company nor Linux Academy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Learning by Questions company nor Linux Academy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Learning by Questions company nor Linux Academy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Linux Academy company nor Learning by Questions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Linux Academy company nor Learning by Questions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Linux Academy company employs more people globally than Learning by Questions company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Linux Academy nor Learning by Questions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X