Comparison Overview

LINLEY

VS

Mouka Limited

LINLEY

60 Pimlico Road, London, SW1W 8LP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.davidlinley.com

David Linley founded his eponymous brand LINLEY in 1985 with the aim of designing and manufacturing furniture of the highest quality, encompassing Retail, Architectural Interior Design, Bespoke as well as Fitted Kitchens & Cabinetry. 30 years on, the now well established British design company LINLEY creates bespoke furniture, interiors, collectable pieces and luxury gifts and accessories that showcase the finest British design and craftsmanship. Over the years, LINLEY has gained a reputation as a leader of modern marquetry creating beautifully unique products using woods and inlay in an imaginative, distinctive way.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mouka Limited

Mouka LTD Plot M Awosika Avenue,, Lagos, 2341, NG
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mouka.com

Manufacturer of polyurethene products and other bedding products including Mattresses, pillows, bed frames, camp mats, raw foam products, baby mattresses and mats. The Mouka name is synonymous with Quality. Mouka was the first foam company to offer a quality warranty on our mattresses and other poly-urethane products. Our ability to maintain this consistency is due to a combination of the latest technology and the determination of our people to add comfort to life, every day. Mouka - Adding comfort to life

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 416
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linley.jpeg
LINLEY
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mouka-limited.jpeg
Mouka Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LINLEY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mouka Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LINLEY in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mouka Limited in 2025.

Incident History — LINLEY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LINLEY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mouka Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mouka Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linley.jpeg
LINLEY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mouka-limited.jpeg
Mouka Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mouka Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LINLEY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mouka Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LINLEY company.

In the current year, Mouka Limited company and LINLEY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mouka Limited company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mouka Limited company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mouka Limited company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LINLEY company nor Mouka Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LINLEY company nor Mouka Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mouka Limited company employs more people globally than LINLEY company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Mouka Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References