Comparison Overview

LINLEY

VS

Comax Australia

LINLEY

60 Pimlico Road, London, SW1W 8LP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

David Linley founded his eponymous brand LINLEY in 1985 with the aim of designing and manufacturing furniture of the highest quality, encompassing Retail, Architectural Interior Design, Bespoke as well as Fitted Kitchens & Cabinetry. 30 years on, the now well established British design company LINLEY creates bespoke furniture, interiors, collectable pieces and luxury gifts and accessories that showcase the finest British design and craftsmanship. Over the years, LINLEY has gained a reputation as a leader of modern marquetry creating beautifully unique products using woods and inlay in an imaginative, distinctive way.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Comax Australia

34 Bishop St, Brisbane, 4059, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Comax Australia is a locally owned, design and manufactuing business who is focused on producing high quality bespoke pieces of furniture for commercial and residential projects. There are three keys areas within the business that drive all client solutions: 1. Bespoke and functional design 2. Authentically guiding designers and architects through design to manufacture 3. Self discovery (directing clients to discover what is possible and in the process they learn at little more about themselves) The Comax Australia unique selling point is currently centred around key designer and owner Susan Denham who has 30+ years experience as a designer in the understanding of scale, proportion and the aesthetic. Dimensional and spacial thinking adds so much value to the bespoke solutions they deliver in partnership with the architects and designers they work with. For Comax Australia, as a future brand there is an opportunity to build a brand story around the visioning of the individual ideas and concepts of your clients. They can then share the journey taken from design to finished piece with insights and discoveries realised along the way.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linley.jpeg
LINLEY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comax-australia.jpeg
Comax Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LINLEY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Comax Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LINLEY in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comax Australia in 2025.

Incident History — LINLEY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LINLEY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Comax Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comax Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linley.jpeg
LINLEY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/comax-australia.jpeg
Comax Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LINLEY company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Comax Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Comax Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LINLEY company.

In the current year, Comax Australia company and LINLEY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Comax Australia company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Comax Australia company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Comax Australia company nor LINLEY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LINLEY company nor Comax Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LINLEY company nor Comax Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LINLEY company employs more people globally than Comax Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LINLEY nor Comax Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.