Comparison Overview

Links

VS

Rackapps

Links

Ljubljanska 2A, Sveta Nedelja, 10431, HR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mi smo nacionalni lider u prodaji i proizvodnji računala te računalnih komponenti. Prisutni smo širom Hrvatske s 19 specijaliziranih trgovina u 15 gradova, kao i webshopom s preko 12.000 artikala! Imamo više od 20 godina iskustva koje se ističu kvalitetnim asortimanom proizvoda, brzom uslugom, originalnim rješenjima te stručnim kadrom. 2020. godine pridružili smo se dobitnicima Certifikata Poslodavac Partner.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 408
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rackapps

48761 Kato Road, Fremont, California, 94538, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

RackApps partners with Software companies and mutually develops optimum appliances (Apps). The design of the bare metal works around the efficiency of performance, price, global support, and power usage. Rackapps is the data-center/office Appliance manufacturing division of ASA Computers. At Rackapps, we have assembled a team of Software and hardware engineers to make life simpler for people who buy specialty software for use in their daily work environment. We take “off the shelf parts” and make a branded appliance. This enables the apps to be easily upgraded or serviced.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rackapps.jpeg
Rackapps
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Links
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rackapps
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Links in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rackapps in 2025.

Incident History — Links (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Links cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rackapps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rackapps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/links.jpeg
Links
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rackapps.jpeg
Rackapps
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Links company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rackapps company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rackapps company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Links company.

In the current year, Rackapps company and Links company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rackapps company nor Links company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rackapps company nor Links company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rackapps company nor Links company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Links company nor Rackapps company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Links company nor Rackapps company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Links company employs more people globally than Rackapps company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Links nor Rackapps holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H