Comparison Overview

Links Signs and Graphics Ltd

VS

Colorcom, Inc.

Links Signs and Graphics Ltd

Links Signs and Graphics Ltd, Blackpool, England, FY1 3RP, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Links Signs and Graphics were established in 2008, on the basis of creating and maintaining links and providing a high-quality signage service. Whilst we have grown as a business year on year we still believe in maintaining strong links with our clients and are looking to create new ones every day of the year.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colorcom, Inc.

2437 S. Eastern Ave, Commerce, CA 90040, US
Last Update: 2026-03-31
Between 750 and 799

Colorcom is a Trade Printer serving the West Coast for over 34 years. We offer competitive pricing, high quality print products and Great customer service. We offer small to large Offset Printing as well as Packaging. Colorcom specializes in catalogs, books, brochures, posters, packaging, etc... you name it, we can print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorcom-inc..jpeg
Colorcom, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Links Signs and Graphics Ltd
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorcom, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Links Signs and Graphics Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorcom, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Links Signs and Graphics Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Links Signs and Graphics Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorcom, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorcom, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/links-signs-and-graphics-ltd.jpeg
Links Signs and Graphics Ltd
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorcom-inc..jpeg
Colorcom, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colorcom, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Colorcom, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company.

In the current year, Colorcom, Inc. company and Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorcom, Inc. company nor Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colorcom, Inc. company nor Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colorcom, Inc. company nor Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company nor Colorcom, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company nor Colorcom, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Colorcom, Inc. company employs more people globally than Links Signs and Graphics Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Links Signs and Graphics Ltd nor Colorcom, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H