Comparison Overview

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers

VS

Council of School Attorneys

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers

420 George Street, SYDNEY, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers is a specialist planning, environment and local government firm in NSW. Formed in 2004, the firm acts for a range of public and private clients including state government departments and agencies, local government authorities and major private sector developers. The firm's lawyers have an unrivaled skill set and expertise in relation to planning and development law, environment law, and local government and administrative law, including a specialist focus in relation to development contributions and infrastructure funding.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Council of School Attorneys

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Council of School Attorneys (COSA) supports attorneys representing K-12 public school districts and state school boards associations. The work of the Council is widely respected and a resource for school board attorneys and state association counsel across the country. COSA provides a national forum for the discussion of legal issues and problems encountered by school attorneys in providing legal counsel, advice, and representation to public school boards and state school boards associations. It also promotes and helps develop a closer relationship and better understanding between school attorneys and their clients, school boards, and school boards associations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-taylor-lawyers.jpeg
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-of-school-attorneys.jpeg
Council of School Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Council of School Attorneys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindsay Taylor Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Council of School Attorneys in 2025.

Incident History — Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindsay Taylor Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Council of School Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Council of School Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-taylor-lawyers.jpeg
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/council-of-school-attorneys.jpeg
Council of School Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Council of School Attorneys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Council of School Attorneys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company.

In the current year, Council of School Attorneys company and Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Council of School Attorneys company nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Council of School Attorneys company nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Council of School Attorneys company nor Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company nor Council of School Attorneys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Council of School Attorneys company and Lindsay Taylor Lawyers company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lindsay Taylor Lawyers nor Council of School Attorneys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X