Comparison Overview

LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC

VS

San Antonio Bar Association

LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC

44 The Hill, Canterbury, CT3 1TA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

LINDSAY SHARP is a Notary Public and a member of the Notaries Society of England and Wales based in Kent. She provides a full range of Notary Public services to both private and corporate clients authenticating documents to be used world-wide. Appointments are available at her own offices in Canterbury or Littlebourne, or by arrangement across Kent. When required Lindsay has attended clients at their offices, in hospital, prison and at home. She aims to provide a personal service to suit client needs. For more information visit www.sharpnotary.com

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

San Antonio Bar Association

Bexar County Courthouse
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The San Antonio Bar Association was founded in 1898 and has grown as San Antonio's largest Bar Association, boasting a membership of just under 3,000 attorneys, approximately three quarters of the city's legal community. SABA created the first law school in San Antonio in 1927, which St. Mary’s University took over in 1934. The San Antonio Bar Association offers opportunities to any attorney who wants to make the most of his or her legal career.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-sharp-notary-public.jpeg
LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-bar-association.jpeg
San Antonio Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
San Antonio Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Antonio Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — San Antonio Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Antonio Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindsay-sharp-notary-public.jpeg
LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-bar-association.jpeg
San Antonio Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Antonio Bar Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, San Antonio Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company.

In the current year, San Antonio Bar Association company and LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither San Antonio Bar Association company nor LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither San Antonio Bar Association company nor LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither San Antonio Bar Association company nor LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company nor San Antonio Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

San Antonio Bar Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company.

San Antonio Bar Association company employs more people globally than LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LINDSAY SHARP NOTARY PUBLIC nor San Antonio Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X