Comparison Overview

lindenpartners

VS

Deaton & Berry, PLLC

lindenpartners

Friedrichstraße 95, Berlin, 10117, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

lindenpartners berät aus Berlin-Mitte heraus Mandanten in ganz Deutschland. 2006 von Anwälten aus Großkanzleien gegründet, ist die Sozietät stetig gewachsen und umfasst heute 35 Anwälte, davon 15 Partner. Wir beraten Mandanten in den klassischen Gebieten des Wirtschaftsrechts. Besonders stark sind wir im Gesellschaftsrecht, M&A und im Bank- und Kapitalmarktrecht sowie bei Gerichts- und Schiedsverfahren. Stolz sind wir darauf, dass eine Vielzahl von internationalen Mandanten auf unseren Rat vertrauen. Wir gehen unseren eigenen Weg. Impressum: https://lindenpartners.eu/impressum/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deaton & Berry, PLLC

229 KATHERINE DR, Flowood, Mississippi, US, 39232
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our prestigious firm offers legal services in insurance, personal injury, domestic relations, real estate, transportation, business law, and immigration. You can feel confident that you're getting competent legal services from our four partners: David “D” F. Berry, IV, R. Jason Canterbury, J. Michael Duncan, and C. Tyler Kent, all of whom have over 30 years of experience representing all aspects of law. Deaton & Berry is known for resolving cases fast and efficiently to avoid further complications with their time-tested and cost-effective methods.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindenpartners.jpeg
lindenpartners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deaton-and-berry.jpeg
Deaton & Berry, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
lindenpartners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deaton & Berry, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lindenpartners in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deaton & Berry, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — lindenpartners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lindenpartners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deaton & Berry, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deaton & Berry, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindenpartners.jpeg
lindenpartners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deaton-and-berry.jpeg
Deaton & Berry, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both lindenpartners company and Deaton & Berry, PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Deaton & Berry, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to lindenpartners company.

In the current year, Deaton & Berry, PLLC company and lindenpartners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deaton & Berry, PLLC company nor lindenpartners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Deaton & Berry, PLLC company nor lindenpartners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Deaton & Berry, PLLC company nor lindenpartners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither lindenpartners company nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither lindenpartners company nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

lindenpartners company employs more people globally than Deaton & Berry, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither lindenpartners nor Deaton & Berry, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X