Comparison Overview

Lincolnshire Media

VS

FreeStyleMagazine

Lincolnshire Media

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Lincolnshire Media, which is owned by Trinity Mirror Regionals, is the publisher of six newsbrands, which include: The Lincolnshire Echo/lincolnshireelive.co.uk, The Retford Times/retfordtimes.co.uk, Boston Target, Sleaford Target, East Coast and the Wolds Target. We publish The Journal, a monthly lifestyle glossy magazine and The Business. We also run events, which include: Jobs Fairs Community Awards Education Awards Lincolnshire Energy Awards Lincolnshire Business Week (which includes Business Awards)

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FreeStyleMagazine

Forum Seestraße, Berlin, 13347, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Even before the launch of issue 1, FSM created a stir in the world of fashion, art and design. WAD, Jalouse, We Love Magazines, The Wall Street Journal, Elle Italia and others have written about us, waiting in anticipation for the magazine. Described as “cheeky”, “ingenious” and “unusual” we like to describe it as ‘a magazine for creative people who like to play’. Inspired by our love of frisbee together with our passion for creativity, FSM is a round format magazine that comes inside a frisbee. Together, they become a design object in its own right.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnshire-media.jpeg
Lincolnshire Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/freestylemagazine.jpeg
FreeStyleMagazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lincolnshire Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FreeStyleMagazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincolnshire Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FreeStyleMagazine in 2025.

Incident History — Lincolnshire Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincolnshire Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FreeStyleMagazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FreeStyleMagazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnshire-media.jpeg
Lincolnshire Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/freestylemagazine.jpeg
FreeStyleMagazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lincolnshire Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FreeStyleMagazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FreeStyleMagazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lincolnshire Media company.

In the current year, FreeStyleMagazine company and Lincolnshire Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FreeStyleMagazine company nor Lincolnshire Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FreeStyleMagazine company nor Lincolnshire Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FreeStyleMagazine company nor Lincolnshire Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lincolnshire Media company nor FreeStyleMagazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lincolnshire Media company nor FreeStyleMagazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincolnshire Media company employs more people globally than FreeStyleMagazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lincolnshire Media nor FreeStyleMagazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.