Comparison Overview

Lincoln Park Conservancy

VS

Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance

Lincoln Park Conservancy

2430 N Cannon Dr, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60614
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Lincoln Park is Chicago’s largest and most visited park and the third most visited city park in the U.S. with over 20 million visitors annually. The Park is Chicago’s front door and is often called Chicago’s ‘Central Park.’ The Lincoln Park Conservancy’s mission is to preserve and enhance Lincoln Park’s inspiring beauty for current and future generations. Established in 1984, the Lincoln Park Conservancy works to enhance Chicago’s largest park through volunteer power, fundraising and park improvements. Through its master agreement with the Chicago Park District, the Conservancy manages treasured Park sites including the Alfred Caldwell Lily Pool, Abraham Lincoln Monument and Gardens, Lincoln Park Conservatory and North Pond Nature Sanctuary, in addition to general stewardship activities across Lincoln Park’s 1,200 acres. Our volunteer docents offer free tours of the park's natural, historic and cultural elements in order to build visitor connections to these unique places. Monthly wildflower walks are hosted at the Lily Pool and North Pond, educating guests about Chicago's historic connection to them and their importance to local ecology. Conservancy volunteers give back nearly 3,000 hours of service each year, engaging with park visitors and maintaining this portion of Lincoln Park. One unique aspect of the Conservancy’s approach is that when the Conservancy commits to a site, it embarks on the site’s long-term care and if needed, restoration. As the Conservancy’s managed sites are free of admission, the private funding we raise to support these park assets is of central importance.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance

None
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance was established in 2009 with a mission to promote the universal message of freedom as basic human right, educate public about the struggle for tolerance and against oppression, and to help diverse communities preserve the memories of genocide and persecution they suffered throughout history. The Museum is a non-profit 501 (c) 3 organization. The Museum’s collections and exhibitions present a panoramic picture of many tragic events of recent and past history. The Museum preserves memories of the victims, educates the public about the dangers of violence and prejudice, and explains the value of tolerance, diversity and mutual respect and understanding. It also offers educational programs, workshops, and study materials placed in a cultural and historical context.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-human-rights-freedom-and-tolerance.jpeg
Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lincoln Park Conservancy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Park Conservancy in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance in 2026.

Incident History — Lincoln Park Conservancy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Park Conservancy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-human-rights-freedom-and-tolerance.jpeg
Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lincoln Park Conservancy company and Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lincoln Park Conservancy company.

In the current year, Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company and Lincoln Park Conservancy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincoln Park Conservancy company employs more people globally than Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Museum of Human Rights, Freedom and Tolerance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.