Comparison Overview

Lincoln Park Conservancy

VS

Coral Springs Museum of Art

Lincoln Park Conservancy

2430 N Cannon Dr, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60614
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Lincoln Park is Chicago’s largest and most visited park and the third most visited city park in the U.S. with over 20 million visitors annually. The Park is Chicago’s front door and is often called Chicago’s ‘Central Park.’ The Lincoln Park Conservancy’s mission is to preserve and enhance Lincoln Park’s inspiring beauty for current and future generations. Established in 1984, the Lincoln Park Conservancy works to enhance Chicago’s largest park through volunteer power, fundraising and park improvements. Through its master agreement with the Chicago Park District, the Conservancy manages treasured Park sites including the Alfred Caldwell Lily Pool, Abraham Lincoln Monument and Gardens, Lincoln Park Conservatory and North Pond Nature Sanctuary, in addition to general stewardship activities across Lincoln Park’s 1,200 acres. Our volunteer docents offer free tours of the park's natural, historic and cultural elements in order to build visitor connections to these unique places. Monthly wildflower walks are hosted at the Lily Pool and North Pond, educating guests about Chicago's historic connection to them and their importance to local ecology. Conservancy volunteers give back nearly 3,000 hours of service each year, engaging with park visitors and maintaining this portion of Lincoln Park. One unique aspect of the Conservancy’s approach is that when the Conservancy commits to a site, it embarks on the site’s long-term care and if needed, restoration. As the Conservancy’s managed sites are free of admission, the private funding we raise to support these park assets is of central importance.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coral Springs Museum of Art

2855 Coral Springs Drive Suite A, Coral Springs, Florida, 33065, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Coral Springs Museum of Art is a museums and institutions company based out of 2855 Coral Springs Drive Suite A, Coral Springs, Florida, United States. What began late in 1996 as a City project to build a comprehensive recreation and community center, soon turned into The Coral Springs Center for the Arts – a performance theater and art museum. Housed in the impressive 30,000 square foot center for the arts building is the equally impressive Coral Springs Museum of Art which was incorporated in January of 1997. Our mission is to engage and connect our diverse communities with dynamic exhibits, exceptional art education, stimulating specialty programs and inspired events to ignite cultural enrichment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-springs-museum-of-art.jpeg
Coral Springs Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lincoln Park Conservancy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coral Springs Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Park Conservancy in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coral Springs Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Lincoln Park Conservancy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Park Conservancy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coral Springs Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coral Springs Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-springs-museum-of-art.jpeg
Coral Springs Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lincoln Park Conservancy company and Coral Springs Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Coral Springs Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lincoln Park Conservancy company.

In the current year, Coral Springs Museum of Art company and Lincoln Park Conservancy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coral Springs Museum of Art company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Coral Springs Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Coral Springs Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coral Springs Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Lincoln Park Conservancy company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy nor Coral Springs Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H