Comparison Overview

Lincoln Press

VS

Windward Communications Group

Lincoln Press

undefined, undefined, undefined, 75247, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lincolnpress.biz

Lincoln Press is composed of several different divisions to best serve your printing and graphics needs. Our state of the art facilities stay abreast of changing trends and developments in the industry. We have an excellent staff that uses the latest technology available to supply you with a superior product. When your project is ready to print our offset facilities will handle the printing of everything from your business forms, brochures and letterhead to pocket folders and direct mail just to name a few. Our expertise in large format printing can provide you with items such as short run posters, point of purchase items, window decals or pieces that might be subject to weather. With all the above, there is rarely a printing project beyond our capacity.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Windward Communications Group

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.windwardpress.com

Windward Communications Group is a quality sheet fed multi color offset printer providing full service printing and graphics. We strive to be a strategically oriented business, aware of and embracing changing technology, markets and other pertinent external developments. We have a strong commitment to place the needs of the customer at the fore front of every job. We are involved in job engineering and proactive in offering options to maintain budget constraints. We anticipate technical problems and discuss solutions to ensure customer expectations can be met. We stand behind the products we produce. The greatest value we have to offer is our ability to respond to the complete needs of our customers. Windward Communications Group is certified for Forest Stewardship Council Chain-Of-Custody. The Forest Stewardship Council, or FSC, promotes the responsible management of the world's forests. Our knowledgeable and experienced staff assures the customer that he or she will receive immediate and continuous attention throughout the various steps of their project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-press.jpeg
Lincoln Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windward-communications-group.jpeg
Windward Communications Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lincoln Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Windward Communications Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Windward Communications Group in 2025.

Incident History — Lincoln Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Windward Communications Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Windward Communications Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-press.jpeg
Lincoln Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windward-communications-group.jpeg
Windward Communications Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Windward Communications Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lincoln Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Windward Communications Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lincoln Press company.

In the current year, Windward Communications Group company and Lincoln Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Windward Communications Group company nor Lincoln Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Windward Communications Group company nor Lincoln Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Windward Communications Group company nor Lincoln Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lincoln Press company nor Windward Communications Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lincoln Press company nor Windward Communications Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincoln Press company employs more people globally than Windward Communications Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lincoln Press nor Windward Communications Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References