Comparison Overview

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

VS

Technology Leaders Club

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

113 Brattle Street, None, Cambridge, MA, US, 02138
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy seeks to improve quality of life through the effective use, taxation, and stewardship of land. A nonprofit private operating foundation whose origins date to 1946, the Lincoln Institute researches and recommends creative approaches to land as a solution to economic, social, and environmental challenges. Through education, training, publications, and events, we integrate theory and practice to inform public policy decisions worldwide.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Technology Leaders Club

Bath, BA1 1RG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Technology Leaders Club, part of Rela8 Group, is the home to the authentic voice of the tech community. TLC is a sales-free platform where Technology Leaders can gather, share insights, and connect with each other in meaningful ways. Our community of over 10,000 tech executives have priority access to a range of networking and roundtable events, as well as exclusive access to our library of whitepapers, interviews, expert Q&A’s, and much more. Created for, and driven by, the Tech community, the Technology Leaders Club is the jewel in Rela8 Group’s crown.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-institute-of-land-policy.jpeg
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technology Leaders Club
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Leaders Club in 2025.

Incident History — Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technology Leaders Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Leaders Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincoln-institute-of-land-policy.jpeg
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-leaders-club.jpeg
Technology Leaders Club
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technology Leaders Club company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company.

In the current year, Technology Leaders Club company and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technology Leaders Club company nor Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company nor Technology Leaders Club company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Technology Leaders Club company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company.

Lincoln Institute of Land Policy company employs more people globally than Technology Leaders Club company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lincoln Institute of Land Policy nor Technology Leaders Club holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X