Comparison Overview

LIMCO Engineering Inc

VS

GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd

LIMCO Engineering Inc

3127 Hallandale Beach Boulevard., Pembroke Park,, Florida, 33009, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

LIMCO Engineering Inc. has been providing mechanical & electrical engineering design services for the past 22 years to markets in the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). Since 2013, LIMCO Engineering has expanded its global reach by establishing an operation in the State of Florida, USA.During its 22 years of operation, LIMCO Engineering has successfully completed mechanical and electrical engineering design in the following sectors. Education Emergency Management & Disaster Recovery Power Transportation LIMCO Engineering Inc. is a technology driven firm and as such has developed the capability of using technology to work remotely from our operation base. We have the required staffing to undertake and deliver mechanical and electrical projects at the highest quality.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd

31/139 Commercial Road, Newstead, QLD, 4006, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

GRG Consulting Engineers is a professional consulting company that has delivered innovative, practical and efficient solutions to its clients since 1996. With a head office in Brisbane and branch offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide and Bendigo, GRG works locally, nationally and internationally across a number of industry sectors, for companies large and small. GRG offers a range of engineering disciplines including: * Mechanical * Structural * Civil * Electrical * Process & Control * Manufacturing * Chemical * Pharmaceutical GRG's ingenuitive team has solid experience with feasibility studies, plant and equipment upgrades and expansion projects. Our competitive market position also enables the firm to provide services on smaller projects, helping clients to complete their annual capital projects while remaining cost-effective and adaptable to individual client needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/limco-engineering-inc.jpeg
LIMCO Engineering Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grg-consulting-engineers-pty-ltd.jpeg
GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LIMCO Engineering Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LIMCO Engineering Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — LIMCO Engineering Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LIMCO Engineering Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/limco-engineering-inc.jpeg
LIMCO Engineering Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grg-consulting-engineers-pty-ltd.jpeg
GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LIMCO Engineering Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LIMCO Engineering Inc company.

In the current year, GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company and LIMCO Engineering Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company nor LIMCO Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company nor LIMCO Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company nor LIMCO Engineering Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc company nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc company nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than LIMCO Engineering Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LIMCO Engineering Inc nor GRG Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H