Comparison Overview

lignowski consulting

VS

Rob Hall Design

lignowski consulting

Marigold Circle, Westland, Michigan, 48185-9632, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

lignowski consulting is a web design & development solutions firm. We offer HTML5 and CSS3 site platforms using JavaScript, jQuery, or both depending on your build requirements. Our Responsive Web Designs are fully functioning for all mobile devices. We account for the need to use any device anywhere at any time.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rob Hall Design

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Rob Hall Design is a Richmond, Virginia based design creative providing the best logo design, graphic design and Web Design Richmond VA has to offer. I believe great design comes from sharp thinking and reflective practice. I have worked with many large brands over the years including Lowe’s Home Improvement, General Electric, Capital One, Genworth Financial, McGraw Hill, Sonic Automotive and Charlotte Area Transit to name a few. With a variety of experience in brand identity, print, packaging, and digital, I am able to offer a multitude of skills to my clients. So whether the client requires a logo, a range of packaging, a website (or all of the above), I can ensure that the whole experience is positive, consistent and effective.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lignowski-consulting.jpeg
lignowski consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rob-hall-design.jpeg
Rob Hall Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
lignowski consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rob Hall Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lignowski consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rob Hall Design in 2025.

Incident History — lignowski consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lignowski consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rob Hall Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rob Hall Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lignowski-consulting.jpeg
lignowski consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rob-hall-design.jpeg
Rob Hall Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

lignowski consulting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rob Hall Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rob Hall Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to lignowski consulting company.

In the current year, Rob Hall Design company and lignowski consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rob Hall Design company nor lignowski consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rob Hall Design company nor lignowski consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rob Hall Design company nor lignowski consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither lignowski consulting company nor Rob Hall Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither lignowski consulting company nor Rob Hall Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rob Hall Design company employs more people globally than lignowski consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither lignowski consulting nor Rob Hall Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X