Comparison Overview

Lighthouse Public Affairs

VS

Seattle Community Police Commission

Lighthouse Public Affairs

857 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA, 94133, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2010, Lighthouse Public Affairs is the preeminent state-wide public affairs consultancy in California. With offices in San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Oakland, Silicon Valley and Marin, our team is comprised with seasoned professionals from a multitude of disciplines, and a roster of industry-leading clients. Lighthouse is uniquely positioned to manage the most complex regulatory, community, governmental and communications challenges in the nation’s most dynamic state. For over a decade, Lighthouse Public Affairs has worked to lay a strong foundation for success. The firm in place today was expanded with care, step by intentional step, always focused on our clients’ needs, desires and best interests. Our varied clients have many different goals: public relations campaigns, earned media procurement, complex land use matters, and more. The seasoned Lighthouse team has helped our clients manage manifold challenges and navigate to success.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seattle Community Police Commission

Seattle Municipal Tower Building, PO Box 94765, Seattle, WA, US, 98124-7065
Last Update: 2025-12-11

The Seattle Community Police Commission is unique. A number of U.S. cities are under consent decrees with the federal government to reform their police departments. Seattle is the only one with a civilian commission with a mandate to develop reform recommendations and represent community interests and perspectives. The CPC actively engages the public to obtain community input on its current and future work.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-public-affairs.jpeg
Lighthouse Public Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-community-police-commission.jpeg
Seattle Community Police Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lighthouse Public Affairs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seattle Community Police Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lighthouse Public Affairs in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle Community Police Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Lighthouse Public Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lighthouse Public Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seattle Community Police Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle Community Police Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-public-affairs.jpeg
Lighthouse Public Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-community-police-commission.jpeg
Seattle Community Police Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lighthouse Public Affairs company and Seattle Community Police Commission company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Seattle Community Police Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lighthouse Public Affairs company.

In the current year, Seattle Community Police Commission company and Lighthouse Public Affairs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seattle Community Police Commission company nor Lighthouse Public Affairs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seattle Community Police Commission company nor Lighthouse Public Affairs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seattle Community Police Commission company nor Lighthouse Public Affairs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs company nor Seattle Community Police Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs company nor Seattle Community Police Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lighthouse Public Affairs company employs more people globally than Seattle Community Police Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lighthouse Public Affairs nor Seattle Community Police Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N