Comparison Overview

Lighthouse Printing

VS

Sandy Alexander

Lighthouse Printing

19027 S. Jodi Road, Suite G, Mokena, Illinois, 60448, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://lighthouseprinting.net

We offer complete graphic design and commercial printing as well as warehousing/inventory control. Here is a list of some of the products we offer: Greeting / holiday cards Clothing and apparel Mailing and fulfillment Logo design Quality offset Digital and variable data printing Printed and blank film Printed and blank bags Flexographic printing Inventory management Embroidery and silk screen printing Signs and banners - indoor and outdoor Decals- indoor and outdoor Thermal transfer labels and ribbons Thermal transfer printers,parts, and repair Business forms Promotional items, awards, trophies and business products

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sandy Alexander

200 Entin Road, Clifton, NJ, 07014, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sandyalexander.com

We are a brand experience company. On a mission to help our partners create new levels of real-life consumer connection. Commercial Print – Direct Mail – Wide Format – Visual Experience – Fulfillment – Technology. Using the following four guiding principles, we have built lasting relationships with our clients: • One Source: We pride ourselves on providing a single contact point for all development, production, fulfillment and delivery, essentially handling any project from start-to-finish. • Color Science: Our world-class color scientist is able to go beyond the G7 certification, printing across all substrates and platforms while continually providing color consistency in every project. • Marketing Technology: By providing advanced marketing technologies, we utilize data-driven marketing and marketing automation strategies to reach multi-channel marketing solutions that yield record-breaking response rates. • Sustainable Intelligence: Leading and inspiring our industry in sustainable practices, we run on 100% wind power energy and have been ISO 14001 and Sustainable Green Printer (SGP) certified, as well as tri-certified for chain-of-custody sustainable paper (FSC, SFI, PEFC).

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-printing.jpeg
Lighthouse Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandy-alexander.jpeg
Sandy Alexander
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lighthouse Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandy Alexander
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lighthouse Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandy Alexander in 2025.

Incident History — Lighthouse Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lighthouse Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sandy Alexander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandy Alexander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-printing.jpeg
Lighthouse Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandy-alexander.jpeg
Sandy Alexander
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lighthouse Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sandy Alexander company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandy Alexander company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lighthouse Printing company.

In the current year, Sandy Alexander company and Lighthouse Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor Lighthouse Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor Lighthouse Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor Lighthouse Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Printing company nor Sandy Alexander company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lighthouse Printing company nor Sandy Alexander company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sandy Alexander company employs more people globally than Lighthouse Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lighthouse Printing nor Sandy Alexander holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References