Comparison Overview

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum

VS

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum

81 Lighthouse Avenue, St. Augustine, Florida, 32080, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

A pivotal navigation tool and unique landmark of St. Augustine for over 150 years, the St. Augustine Light House and Maritime Museum, Inc. is a non profit Museum with a mission to discover, preserve present and keep alive the stories of the nation's oldest port as symbolized by our working St. Augustine Lighthouse. We keep the light shining as the front porch light for our community; We save six historic structures, and we preserve over 19,000 artifacts, and archival books, records and documents. Our archaeological scientists explore hundreds of shipwrecks under the waves and we teach young people about maritime heritage and marine sciences. Our summer camp for children offers scholarships to at-risk youth through a partnership with Sertoma Club. Through interactive exhibits, guided tours and maritime research, the 501(c)(3) non-profit St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum makes a difference in our community, and invite you to help out with your visit or membership purchase.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)

750 Marguerite Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, US, 27106
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The North Carolina Museum of Art, Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) offers a front row seat to the art of our time through exhibitions, experiences, and education programs with a focus on regional working artists. Founded in 1956 and located on the scenic James G. Hanes estate, NCMA Winston-Salem offers unique large-scale indoor and outdoor settings for exploring the intersections of contemporary art and culture. NCMA Winston-Salem is a division of the NC Department of Natural & Cultural Resources. Additional funding is provided by the James G. Hanes Memorial Fund and private donations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-archaeological-maritime-program.jpeg
St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ncmawinstonsalem.jpeg
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) in 2026.

Incident History — St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lighthouse-archaeological-maritime-program.jpeg
St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ncmawinstonsalem.jpeg
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company.

In the current year, NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company and St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company.

St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum company employs more people globally than NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither St. Augustine Lighthouse & Maritime Museum nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N