Comparison Overview

Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW

VS

Universität Leipzig

Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW

Hofackerstrasse 30, Muttenz, Basel-Landschaft, 4132, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Die Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW mit Sitz in Muttenz gehört zur Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz (FHNW). Sie ist Teil des grössten Life Sciences-Standorts Europas. In diesem Zentrum von Pharma- und Medizintechnik, der chemischen Industrie sowie Umwelt- und Biotechnologie werden kompetente Fachkräfte ausgebildet und Lösungen für die gesellschaftlichen und wirtschaftlichen Anforderungen von morgen erarbeitet. Wir setzen uns ein für neue präventive und therapeutische Produkte und Dienstleistungen, eine verbesserte Lebensqualität und einen nachhaltigen Umgang mit der Umwelt.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universität Leipzig

Ritterstraße 26, Leipzig, Saxony, 04109, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Als klassische Volluniversität deckt die Alma mater Lipsiensis die ganze Bandbreite ab – über 140 Studiengänge – von Naturwissenschaften über Jura und Medizin bis hin zu einem breit gefächerten Angebot an geisteswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen. …aktuell studieren über 28.000 Studenten an der Universität Leipzig, die von über 400 Professoren betreut werden …insgesamt sind über 4.500 Mitarbeiter an der Universität Leipzig beschäftigt …die im Jahr 1409 gegründete Universität ist die zweitälteste Deutschlands …die Universität zählt mehr als 150.000 Alumni, darunter Angela Merkel ...bisher studierten, lehrten oder forschten 30 Nobelpreisträger an der Universität Leipzig Informationen zur Alumni-Arbeit der Universität Leipzig: www.alumni.uni-leipzig.de Bei Fragen oder Anregungen wenden Sie sich gern an: [email protected] Hier finden Sie uns auch: Facebook @unileipzig // http://www.facebook.com/unileipzig Twitter @UniLeipzig // http://www.twitter.com/unileipzig Instagram @universitaetleipzig // http://www.instagram.com/universitaetleipzig YouTube @UniversityofLeipzig // https://www.youtube.com/UniversityofLeipzig Impressum: https://www.uni-leipzig.de/impressum Netiquette: https://uni-l.de/netiquette

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3,296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifesciences_fhnw.jpeg
Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-leipzig.jpeg
Universität Leipzig
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universität Leipzig
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Leipzig in 2025.

Incident History — Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universität Leipzig (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Leipzig cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifesciences_fhnw.jpeg
Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-leipzig.jpeg
Universität Leipzig
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Universität Leipzig company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universität Leipzig company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company.

In the current year, Universität Leipzig company and Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universität Leipzig company nor Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universität Leipzig company nor Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universität Leipzig company nor Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company nor Universität Leipzig company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Universität Leipzig company.

Universität Leipzig company employs more people globally than Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW nor Universität Leipzig holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L