Comparison Overview

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.

VS

Amen Clinics, Inc.

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.

475 Clinton Ave, Bridgeport, 06605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

LifeBridge is committed to addressing the complex challenges faced by youth, adults, and families in the greater Bridgeport community in the realm of mental health and wellness. Our services, policies, and workplace culture are shaped through a trauma-informed lens, which ensures all are developed with the goal of helping our staff and clients feel physically and psychologically safe. We are a leading provider of mental health services and provide free trauma and cultural awareness training to the community free of charge. We believe quality behavioral healthcare should be accessible, person-centered, and holistic. No one is denied access to services due to inability to pay. There is a discounted/sliding fee schedule available. LifeBridge is one of eight Outpatient Urban Trauma Centers in CT.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amen Clinics, Inc.

959 South Coast Dr, Costa Mesa, California, 92626, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Amen Clinics specializes in brain health and innovative diagnosis and treatment for a wide variety of neuropsychiatric, behavioral and learning problems among children, teenagers and adults. Established in 1989 by Daniel G. Amen, M.D., the center has a national reputation for utilizing brain SPECT imaging for a wide variety of neuropsychiatric problems, including ADD/ADHD, anxiety, depression, PTSD, autism spectrum disorders and memory problems. As the most experienced authorities on SPECT imaging in the world, Dr. Daniel Amen, and physicians at Amen Clinics have conducted and analyzed more than 225,000 brain SPECT images in the last 30+ years. We hope to meet you and help you soon, just as we have helped so many other people around the world. If you or someone you care about is struggling with ADHD, anxiety, depression, overeating, addictions, memory issues, brain fog, or other emotional or cognitive issues, we are here to help! Call us today at 888-288-9834.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 326
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifebridgect.jpeg
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amenclinics.jpeg
Amen Clinics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amen Clinics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amen Clinics, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amen Clinics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amen Clinics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifebridgect.jpeg
LifeBridge Community Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amenclinics.jpeg
Amen Clinics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amen Clinics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amen Clinics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Amen Clinics, Inc. company and LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amen Clinics, Inc. company nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amen Clinics, Inc. company nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amen Clinics, Inc. company nor LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company nor Amen Clinics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Amen Clinics, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company.

Amen Clinics, Inc. company employs more people globally than LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LifeBridge Community Services, Inc. nor Amen Clinics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N