Comparison Overview

Lifeboat Foundation

VS

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ

Lifeboat Foundation

1468 James Rd, Gardnerville, Nevada, 89460, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Lifeboat Foundation is a nonprofit nongovernmental organization dedicated to encouraging scientific advancements while helping humanity survive existential risks and possible misuse of increasingly powerful technologies, including genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and robotics/AI, as we move towards the Singularity. Lifeboat Foundation is pursuing a variety of options, including helping to accelerate the development of technologies to defend humanity such as new methods to combat viruses, effective nanotechnological defensive strategies, and even self-sustaining space colonies in case the other defensive strategies fail. We believe that, in some situations, it might be feasible to relinquish technological capacity in the public interest (for example, we are against the U.S. government posting the recipe for the 1918 flu virus on the internet). We have some of the best minds on the planet working on programs to enable our survival. We invite you to join our cause! Visit our LinkedIn group at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/35656 and our site at https://lifeboat.com. Visit our Facebook group at https://www.facebook.com/groups/lifeboatfoundation. Watch our YouTube channel at https://youtube.com/LifeboatHQ. Read our book โ€œThe Human Race to the Future: What Could Happen โ€” and What to Doโ€ at http://amzn.to/2CQzbKj. Interact with its author at https://www.facebook.com/groups/thehumanracetothefuture. We currently have a job opening for HQ Supervisor at https://lifeboat.com/ex/hq.supervisor

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ

Onze Lieve Vrouweplein 21, Maastricht, undefined, 6211 HE, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

ECDPM is an independent and non-partisan โ€˜think and do tankโ€™ focusing on international cooperation and development policy in Europe and Africa. Our main areas of work include peace and security, migration, governance in Africa, food security, economic transformation and EU external affairs. Our more than 70 staff members from over 25 countries worldwide provide independent research, advice and practical support to policymakers, advisors and practitioners in Europe, Africa and beyond โ€“ in order to make policies work for sustainable and inclusive global development.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeboat-foundation.jpeg
Lifeboat Foundation
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecdpm.jpeg
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
โ€”
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
โ€”
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lifeboat Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lifeboat Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECDPM ๐ŸŒ in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Lifeboat Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lifeboat Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ECDPM ๐ŸŒ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECDPM ๐ŸŒ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeboat-foundation.jpeg
Lifeboat Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ecdpm.jpeg
ECDPM ๐ŸŒ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lifeboat Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lifeboat Foundation company.

In the current year, ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company and Lifeboat Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Lifeboat Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Lifeboat Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company nor Lifeboat Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation company nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation company nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lifeboat Foundation company employs more people globally than ECDPM ๐ŸŒ company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lifeboat Foundation nor ECDPM ๐ŸŒ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X