Comparison Overview

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)

VS

Green Technology Center Korea

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)

1010, AT
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.liva.li

The Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) was established in October 2007. The founding of the European branch of the Liechtenstein Institute expanded upon the success of the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination (LISD) of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. The goal of LIVA is to become a bridgehead organization between Austria, Europe, the United States and the Middle East. Through its work on conflict management, intercultural and inter-religious dialogue, and state- and security-building issues, LIVA works to find a modus vivendi between various cultures, religions, ethnicities and political groups. LIVA is an independent, non-partisan and nonprofit organization.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Green Technology Center Korea

17th fl. Namsan Square Bldg,173, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 04554, KR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gtck.re.kr

The Green Technology Center-Korea (GTC-K) is a government-funded think-tank that coordinates and supports national green technology R&D policies in collaboration with Korea’s ministries and agencies. GTC-K serves as Korea’s gateway for global green technology cooperation, as it connects developed and developing countries for growth and diffusion of green technology and strategies. GTC-K is partnered with UNDP, UNESCAP, UNIDO and World Bank, and its mission is to lead green technology innovation and create a new growth engine for the developing countries in the world.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liechtenstein-institute-in-vienna-austria-liva-.jpeg
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtck.jpeg
Green Technology Center Korea
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Green Technology Center Korea
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Technology Center Korea in 2025.

Incident History — Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Green Technology Center Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Technology Center Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liechtenstein-institute-in-vienna-austria-liva-.jpeg
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gtck.jpeg
Green Technology Center Korea
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Technology Center Korea company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Green Technology Center Korea company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company.

In the current year, Green Technology Center Korea company and Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Green Technology Center Korea company nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Green Technology Center Korea company nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Green Technology Center Korea company nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company nor Green Technology Center Korea company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company nor Green Technology Center Korea company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) nor Green Technology Center Korea holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References