Comparison Overview

Lidl France

VS

Belk

Lidl France

1, Rue de Hanovre, Châtenay-Malabry, 92290, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Lidl s’est implanté en France en 1989. Nous avons connu une expansion très rapide qui nous a permis de devenir un acteur incontournable de la grande distribution. Lidl France, c’est aujourd’hui 45 000 collaborateurs, plus de 1 570 magasins, 25 Directions Régionales et un siège social sur 2 sites : à Strasbourg qui regroupe toutes les fonctions supports administratives (Administration RH et Formation, Finances, Informatique) et à Rungis où nous avons regroupé toutes les fonctions supports opérationnelles (Centrale d’Achats, Logistique et Supply Chain, Immobilier, Technique, Développement Commercial, Investissements, RH, Juridique et Frais Généraux). En 2012, Lidl a opéré un tournant de son histoire, avec une nouvelle aventure commerciale : rénovation des magasins, élargissement de l’offre de produit, modernisation des packagings et du merchandising en magasin ; un vrai challenge ! Aujourd’hui, acteur incontournable de la grande distribution française, LIDL s’est imposé en tant que commerce de proximité à assortiment sélectionné : nous avons augmenté nos parts de marché, nous avons su gagner la confiance de nouveaux clients et avons été élu « Meilleure chaîne de magasins » depuis plusieurs années consécutives.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 21,195
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Belk

2801 W Tyvola Rd, Charlotte, 28217, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Charlotte-based Belk, Inc., a privately-owned department store, began when William Henry Belk opened his first store in 1888 with his brother, Dr. John Belk, joining as a partner. What started as two brothers in business has now grown into a legacy of selling great products at great prices, treating customers like family, and giving back to the community. Throughout the years, we’ve changed and grown in so many ways. We’ve added exciting products, adapted the way we work, and made it easier to shop with new technology and services. Today, Belk serves customers at nearly 300 Belk stores in 16 Southeastern states, at belk.com, and through the mobile app.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,732
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lidl-france.jpeg
Lidl France
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belk.jpeg
Belk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lidl France
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Belk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lidl France in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belk in 2026.

Incident History — Lidl France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lidl France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Belk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lidl-france.jpeg
Lidl France
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belk.jpeg
Belk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lidl France company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Belk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Belk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lidl France company.

In the current year, Belk company and Lidl France company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Belk company nor Lidl France company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Belk company nor Lidl France company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Belk company nor Lidl France company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lidl France company nor Belk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lidl France company nor Belk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lidl France company employs more people globally than Belk company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lidl France nor Belk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.