Comparison Overview

Lick & Stick Graphics

VS

doodad

Lick & Stick Graphics

Lick n Stick Graphics, Thorpe, tw20 8rx, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://lnsg.co.uk

Lick & Stick Graphics have a wide variety of services to offer customers from Large format digital printing and graphic design through to bespoke samples, graphic installations, and Event Management. If you are starting a project we would be happy to offer expert advice on printing materials, printing processes, and installation to help you start the ball rolling. #largeformatprinting #visualmerchandising #tvproduction #retaildesign #experientialmarketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

doodad

1842 Colonial Village Ln, Lancaster, 17601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doodad.com

Doodad provides time-sensitive, multi-versioned printed advertising products for use in home-delivered shared distribution systems such as shared direct mail and newspapers. Doodad offers a focused, highly differentiated and value-driven service model based on short-lead times (72 hours) and error-free order fulfillment. Its niche is medium-sized production runs ranging from 20,000 to 1.5 million pieces with moderate to high levels of versioning. Doodad Printed inserts represent an important source of recurring revenue for shared mail marketers and newspaper publishers. Doodad, what’s that? We wanted our name to be fresh, fun, and friendly like all of us – doods and doodettes. We wanted people to say, doodad what’s that? So, we can tell everyone exactly what we do. We wanted our name to express that we’re more than just a printer! Some people use it to refer to each one of our inserts as a ‘dood-ad’. We print million and millions of dood-ad’s. Doodad's Brand Promise: You can lean on us. Doodad’s Brand Character and Attributes: We care Professional and Friendly Local flavor, national capabilities, Market driven vs manufacturing driven Metric driven culture Innovative Consistent, predictable One point of contact React on a dime Redundant capabilities Easy to do business with Flat organizational model Wide array of industry’s most popular products Programs vs 8.5 x 11 mentality

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lick-n-stick-graphics.jpeg
Lick & Stick Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doodad.jpeg
doodad
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lick & Stick Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
doodad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lick & Stick Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for doodad in 2025.

Incident History — Lick & Stick Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lick & Stick Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — doodad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

doodad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lick-n-stick-graphics.jpeg
Lick & Stick Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doodad.jpeg
doodad
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

doodad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lick & Stick Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, doodad company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lick & Stick Graphics company.

In the current year, doodad company and Lick & Stick Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither doodad company nor Lick & Stick Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither doodad company nor Lick & Stick Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither doodad company nor Lick & Stick Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics company nor doodad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lick & Stick Graphics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to doodad company.

doodad company employs more people globally than Lick & Stick Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lick & Stick Graphics nor doodad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References