Comparison Overview

LicenseLogix

VS

BCLP Deutschland

LicenseLogix

140 Grand St., White Plains, NY, 10601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

LicenseLogix was founded to help new and existing businesses quickly and easily obtain the proper licensing. States, counties, and municipalities are becoming stricter on enforcing business licenses but the requirements for these licenses frequently change and can vary greatly among the states. We recognize that business owners and managers value their internal resources to focus on the essentials of their operations. Compliance matters are a vital but dreaded administrative task. Rather than in-house staff constantly monitoring license renewal dates, wasting hours navigating confusing applications or spending valuable time researching filing requirements, LicenseLogix will manage these tasks for you – faster and with proven success rates.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BCLP Deutschland

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mit mehr als 1.275 Anwälten in 32 Büros in Nordamerika, Europa und dem Nahen Osten ist BCLP eine voll integrierte globale Anwaltskanzlei, die ihren Mandanten eine vernetzte Rechtsberatung bietet. Die deutsche Praxis umfasst fast 60 Anwälte, die in Berlin, Frankfurt und Hamburg tätig sind. Die Kanzlei ist bekannt für ihre service- und teamorientierte Kultur und ihre branchenspezifischen Innovationen und bietet ihren Mandanten eine der aktivsten Immobilien-, Finanzdienstleistungs-, Prozess- und Corporate-Risk- sowie M&A-Praxen der Welt.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/licenselogix.jpeg
LicenseLogix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bclp-deutschland.jpeg
BCLP Deutschland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LicenseLogix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BCLP Deutschland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LicenseLogix in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCLP Deutschland in 2025.

Incident History — LicenseLogix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LicenseLogix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BCLP Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCLP Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/licenselogix.jpeg
LicenseLogix
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bclp-deutschland.jpeg
BCLP Deutschland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BCLP Deutschland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LicenseLogix company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BCLP Deutschland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LicenseLogix company.

In the current year, BCLP Deutschland company and LicenseLogix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BCLP Deutschland company nor LicenseLogix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BCLP Deutschland company nor LicenseLogix company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BCLP Deutschland company nor LicenseLogix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LicenseLogix company nor BCLP Deutschland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BCLP Deutschland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LicenseLogix company.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LicenseLogix nor BCLP Deutschland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X