Comparison Overview

Licata Law Group

VS

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson

Licata Law Group

Plaza 45, Suite 420, Independence, OH, 44131, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Licata Law Group serves as Chief Legal Advisors to entrepreneurs and their business ventures with specific expertise in asset protection, transactions (global and domestic), business law, corporate and organizational governance, intellectual property, real estate matters, employment issues and litigation. As entrepreneurs, we understand the daily challenges associated with successfully operating a business, including the range of legal issues affecting and impacting both the entrepreneur and their business venture.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson

4-5 Rutland House, Cheshire, undefined, WA7 2ES, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Welcome to QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson. For nearly 25 years we have been helping the people of North Cheshire, offering a range of services to suit any circumstance. We have a very friendly team who are experts at helping clients when moving house, making a will, setting up a business, or when they have suffered an accident that was not their fault, a family relationship that has broken down or a prosecution for a criminal offence. QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson has provided advice and support and most importantly someone to ‘fight their corner'. We do not just help people. We have experience and expertise in dealing with small and medium commercial enterprises. We are able to assist in a great many areas, including commercial set ups, company acquisitions and advising on and arranging commercial premises leases. QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson began in 1987 and now have five offices in Runcorn, Widnes, Warrington and Northwich. We pride ourselves in giving our clients a first rate legal service, with a personal touch. In that time QualitySolicitors Jones Robertson have established themselves as Solicitors with an excellent reputation for the quality of our work and our advice. We are easily accessible with most of our branches having a high street or close-to-high street presence, close to you. Why not take advantage of a Free initial consultation with one of our experienced solicitors? We hope to hear from you soon!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/licata-&-toerek.jpeg
Licata Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-solicitors-jones-robertson.jpeg
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Licata Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Licata Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson in 2025.

Incident History — Licata Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Licata Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/licata-&-toerek.jpeg
Licata Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-solicitors-jones-robertson.jpeg
Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Licata Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Licata Law Group company.

In the current year, Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company and Licata Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company nor Licata Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company nor Licata Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company nor Licata Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Licata Law Group company nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Licata Law Group company nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Licata Law Group company employs more people globally than Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Licata Law Group nor Quality Solicitors Jones Robertson holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X