Comparison Overview

LibraryWorld, Inc.

VS

Johnson County Public Library-Indiana

LibraryWorld, Inc.

560 South Winchester Boulevard, San Jose, CA, 95128, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Each library subscription is free for up to 30 days. After which time, you can purchase a standard subscription for $425 per year. With a full suite of library automation modules, you can manage one or more libraries using any standard Web browser. Whether it's full patron access, serials tracking, inventory, or security, you'll be impressed with the great return on investment this service provides. Full MARC importing and editing of catalog records, with easy access to over 14 million records from the Library of Congress helps you build and maintain your collection.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Johnson County Public Library-Indiana

49 E Monroe St, Franklin, Indiana, US, 46131
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Johnson County Public Library connects people, resources and experiences. It’s a place where everyone is welcome. It’s a place to learn through reading, discovering and creating. A library is a community of empowered learners, enthusiastic readers and engaged citizens. The Johnson County Public Library-Indiana is made up of four branches (Clark-Pleasant, Franklin, Trafalgar and White River) and the JCPL Services Center, which houses Administration, Human Resources, the Adult Learning Center, and the Marketing & Communications office. For detailed hours, information, and access to our catalog and other resources, please visit us at pageafterpage.org.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/libraryworld-inc..jpeg
LibraryWorld, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcplin.jpeg
Johnson County Public Library-Indiana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LibraryWorld, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johnson County Public Library-Indiana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LibraryWorld, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson County Public Library-Indiana in 2025.

Incident History — LibraryWorld, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LibraryWorld, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johnson County Public Library-Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson County Public Library-Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/libraryworld-inc..jpeg
LibraryWorld, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcplin.jpeg
Johnson County Public Library-Indiana
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LibraryWorld, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LibraryWorld, Inc. company.

In the current year, Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company and LibraryWorld, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company nor LibraryWorld, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company nor LibraryWorld, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company nor LibraryWorld, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. company nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. company nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Johnson County Public Library-Indiana company employs more people globally than LibraryWorld, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LibraryWorld, Inc. nor Johnson County Public Library-Indiana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H